"Setting the Scene" @ ACMI, Through The Eyes of a Cinema Layman

I wrote this a few years ago. Found it on an old USB flash drive I found in a pile of boxes.

I'm not that much of a movie buff compared to some people. Sure, I like movies more than the average guy and did I spend most of my teenage years avoiding social activity by having Kubrick marathons, pretending to be smart by quoting Tarantino at my school teachers and re-enacting sections of Caddyshack with my pathetic friends, but I've never made a movie, gone to film school or even known anyone who works in the industry. These facts became painfully obvious when I entered “Setting the Scene” an exhibition currently on at The Australian Center for the Moving Image (ACMI, God's gift to Melbourne).

If you've ever been to an expo at ACMI, it's downstairs. That sign on the stairs saying “be careful, it's dark, your eyes need time to adjust” isn't there for shits and giggles. Listen to it. I almost dropped my iPhone due to being inserted into darkness all of a sudden. Anyways, Setting the Scene. For those of you who don't know, it's an expo about movie set design. I had no idea set design was so elaborate. It didn't occur to me that they often build these places they film movies in. There's some big fuck off places built too. One part of the expo has in it dedicated to The Terminal. They built the set for that whole thing from scratch. The entire airport terminal. I guess if you're Spielberg you can do that, but still, that's a big fucking set. The exhibit has photos, clips of movies and for some movies, interviews with the set designers about the set of that particular movie. There's also a large, large space dedicated to that movie Australia by our pal Baz. The exhibit is split into areas, I will list them here and give you my opinions on what I saw there:

Spaces of Power (Metropolis, Das Experiment and Minority Report). Metropolis is old and I don't care. Das Experiment I have not seen but now want to as it is about the Stanford Prison Experiment and I like prison (from the outside). Minority Report was cool and so was it's set. There's photos of it here.

Private Spaces (Mon Ocle, The Sacrifice, The Miracle of Bern). Never seen or heard of any of these. Philistine!

Labyrinth Spaces (Alien, The Shining, The Name of the Rose). Alien is fucking awesome and one of my favourite sci-fi movies. The sliver of exhibit dedicated to Alien was underwhelming. A couple of photos up on the wall of the set with no people on it. Boring. I saw the set in the movie? Why do I give a shit? There's not even any interesting back-story to it, or the set designer giving a monologue about how he designed it. Nuthin', just a couple of photos and a projector playing a couple of clips from the movie. Ditto The Shining – I love the movie, but the exhibit didn't add anything new to my knowledge of the movie except that bits of it were filmed in a real hotel. Wikipedia could have told me that. From the 90-second excerpt of “The Name of Rose” all I could gather was that it is about Sean Connery running around in a hessian sack for a few hours. What the hell?

Transit Spaces (Play Time, The Terminal, The Bourne Supremacy). Never saw Play Time and this exhibit failed to inspire me to. The Terminal, like I said earlier, is a Spielberg movie with a Spielberg set. I want to watch it now. Not just because I have a man-crush on Tom Hanks, but if they went to the effort to build a goddamn airport terminal for a movie, then it probably deserves I put some effort in too and watch it. There's even a scale model of what they built in a glass case. Nifty. The Bourne Supremacy part had a whole bunch of bits they took from some hotel and other places as “research” for the set. That was cool. If you're a huge fan, you might get a kick out of it.

Stage Spaces (A Clockwork Orange, Cabaret, Dogville). I saw the Cabaret section as it's got a bloody Oscar in a glass case and I gawked at the shiny gold man, but the rest is so miniscule, that I didn't notice that Dogville and A Clockwork Orange were there. That's how insignificant it was. I even like those movies and I still didn't notice.

Virtual Spaces (Dark City, The Matrix Trilogy, Chronicles of Narnia). Dark City is a great movie that I haven't seen. The Matrix Trilogy has awesome CG and we all know it. There's very impressive scale models of the robots and aliens from the movies that set my geek hard-on into rock mode. So cool, that it makes you want to buy them from the ACMI gift shop, even if they're $500, but then you see the plaque next to them and they're on loan from the actual set designer and not figurines you buy to keep on your nerd shelf (unfortunately). My girlfriend loved the Chronicles of Narnia movie and I think I heard her say “this is lame” while I was looking at a scale model of the car from Speed Racer. I wasn't really paying attention.

Location Spaces (Night Cries: A Rurual Tragedy, Ned Kelly, The Proposition). Bunch of Australian outback themed movies I don't give a damn about. The paintings from the Ned Kelly set planning were kinda cool though. I looked at those for about 20 seconds.

Australia (err, Australia). A whole bit about Australia. Boring as all fuck. I presume it appeals to middle aged women who wish they were on a sheep farm in the middle of nowhere being bonked senseless by Hugh Jackman? Damned if I know. Either way, the majority of the exhibit space is dedicated to Australia when it really should just be for Kubrick films. The whole thing should just be “THE SET DESIGN OF STANLEY KUBRICK” actually, that would have been way better than what I paid to see.

So do I suggest you go? Probably not. Unless you're a massive Australia fan (haha, as if), have a fetish for scale models (there's fucking loads) or work in the movie industry and have a thing for set design. If you are an actual set designer or a student of set design, drop that bag of chips, wipe your hands, put your Mac to sleep and get on a train to the city already. But if you're just a movie nerd who enjoys some of the movies listed in the exhibition synopsis, you will be, like me, bitterly disappointed and lamenting the fact that the $15 entry fee could have been spent on two or three Steven Seagal DVDs. Seagal always delivers bang for buck.

Posted

The "I Have No Money Now" Sale - UPDATED

UPDATED - 10:45PM 14th Jan

Time to get a real job, so all this gear has to go :(

Prices do not include postage. Pickup is available from St. Albans, VIC. I am happy to deliver to you if you're within a 90min drive of my place.

If you have any questions, just ask!

Canon XF100 HD Camcorder - $3,100 each (3x available) (pick up preferred, but can be shipped if you wish)

Manufacturer info (includes receipt - AU stock, not grey import)
Used only a handful of times. Excellent condition. All accessories & packaging included. One camera has a non-Canon lens cap, as I lost it at a job, and is also missing a manual (available to download here), which I have lost somewhere in my office. Price includes a bonus Powervolt high capacity battery (3x available, one each, in addition to the original Canon battery, giving you two batteries per camera), which gives over 5 hours battery life.

ep8a9.jpg

Atlona AT-HD510VGA VGA to HDMI scaler & splitter - $375 each (2x available)

Manufacturer info (includes receipt from AU reseller)
Used twice, excellent condition. Very high quality VGA to HDMI converters.

BsrHb.jpg
id9CB.jpg

Sennheiser MD46 Reporters Mic - $190 each (2x available)
Manufacturer info

No receipt, as I purchased these in the USA about 2 years ago and can't find it. Excellent condition, super durable mic. You can't kill these easily. Comes with hard case as shown in pic.

2IBZe.jpg
3jPi6.jpg

Australian Monitor MX61 Rack Mount Audio Mixer - $100 (pick up preferred, but can be shipped if you wish)
Manufacturer info
Excellent condition, clean & sounds great. No receipt as I purchased it second hand.

RVIZs.jpg
0pJn9.jpg
MPUqy.jpg

Atomos Ninja - Apple ProRes Field Recorder with 2x 500GB HDD - (2 available) - $875ea (ex HDD) - $90 per HDD (4 HDDs available)
Manufacturer info (include receipts for units & HDDs)
Used twice for recording screen output of a conference. Can buy with or without the HDDs (Western Digital Black 500GB WD5000BPKT 2.5" - 4x in total, 2x per unit)

t6mvq.jpg
G6Q4K.jpg
AVtlB.jpg

Hercules MS100B Desk Mic Stand (2x available) - $20 ea
Manufacturer info

Very sturdy mic stands with quick adjust mechanism. Postage isn't cheap for these as they're heavy, so ideally you can pick up or I can bring to you.

UaB8n.jpg

Posted

Solar Shenanigans

One of things on my agenda for 2012 is to have a brand new house. I own the home I live in now, but, it's old and I live next door to my parents. It was okay at first, but now it's just annoying - doubly so for Natalie. Imagine having to live next to the parents of your girlfriend or boyfriend. Ugh.

Using that sweet, sweet, legal tender from the sale of MacTalk (which was all completed last week by the way, yeehaw), we purchased a 700sqm block of land in Bacchus Marsh (about 45min from the CBD) where Natalie and I are going to build a nice big, comfortable and new, house. See, this is the block with my Dad gazing away at it:

Img_0123

There is a *lot* of bullshit involved with building a house - it isn't like you can just rock up to an Apple store, pick a house and know it's good because someone like Steve Jobs and Jony Ive made it. You gotta know your shit. So there's going to be a fair bit of house related stuff, because like I said, I'm going to be building a house and that tends to take up a significant chunk of a person's brain, and I use this blog to sound out ideas and thoughts, to see if I understand them properly. Anyways, this is a long-winded setup for the real point of this post, attempting to explain installing solar panels on the roof of your house.

Electricity isn't cheap and it's only going to get more expensive. I'm currently playing 20.2c/kWh (flat-rate) for power and I used 920kWh on the last quarterly bill. 22c/kWh doesn't seem too far off with the carbon tax coming in to play this year and no doubt, over time, power will just cost more, for reasons I don't really comprehend. But those smarter than me seem to think increasing power bills is as sure as a Pope shitting in the woods with a bear looking on, or something.

Enter solar power - magical crystals that turn invisible sun rays into beautiful electron flows, ready to power my massive fucking TV and ginormous air conditioner. And in Australia, we have lots of sun, lots of big TVs and heaps of air conditioners. Our government throws out all sorts of subsidies at it (I heard someone call it middle-class welfare, heh) and well, have you seen pvoutput.org? That shit just looks cool.

As I'm building a new house, I wanted to see if chucking solar panels on at build time makes a difference in the cost. It doesn't make a difference to installation, but if the panels are on the roof and operating before you move in (e.g: during those few weeks where the roof is on the house, but things like the floors, painting, bathrooms, kitchens, etc. are being installed), electricity is being generated, but not really used (just a couple of tradies), so you can sell that back to the power company and earn credits, making your first and maybe second power bills pretty much free. I'll explain how that works in a minute. It does however, make sense to do at build time, as if I can get the builder to set it up, I can include it as part of the construction of the house (ie: on the builder's contract) and the bank will pay for it as part of the loan, rather than me having to find $10,000-$15,000 to pay for the setup after the house is finished or whilst it's being built.

To calculate if solar power is worth it, you need to understand how a solar power setup works. Most of my info is gleaned from three Australian forums - Whirlpool (computer nerds), Home One (suburban mums with hubbies and bubs and whatnot) and Energy Matters (hippies). It's really dense and there's a lot of jargon, but I think I've managed to distill the info down to what's actually useful and recent (lots of it is out of date) stuff. The biggest issue I found was that the people who really understand how this stuff works have such a poor grasp of English, combined with assuming way too much about what people understand about solar power, that their posts on forums make absolutely no sense and confuse the shit out of everyone.

Step one, obviously, are panels on the roof:

Dsc670056

There are many brands, but the consensus is that you want panels that are made in China, otherwise you're paying a xenophobe tax. No need to pay the exorbitantly high costs for fancy German made (or Australian made) panels. The Chinese ones are just as good unless you're a racist fuck who yells at Indian call centre operators. You do have to take into consideration that you have limited roof space that faces the sun, so you may have to get the fancier ones in order to meet your power requirements, or it could be cheaper to get say, 20x of the fancy panels than 30x of the cheaper ones to get the same power output. A decent warranty (10-years on parts, 25-years on 80% power efficiency) is a good idea too.

Step two, is an inverter:

Sb-tl_2011

Solar panels generate DC power and your house runs on AC power. The inverter takes the DC power the panels generate and turns it into AC power that your appliances (and the power grid you can feed in to) use. This is where you spend the extra money to get something reliable and with a good warranty. Apparently, they do fail, much more than the panels. The brand SMA kept popping up and they have a pretty awesome monitoring/stats system that can hook up to your computer over Bluetooth on almost all their inverters. If I was to buy an inverter, SMA seems the one I'd get.

Step three, installation:

7881290-man-installing-alternative-energy-photovoltaic-solar-panels-on-roof

You also need someone to install it. Make sure you get someone off this list from the government. They *should* know what they're doing. It's just like any other trade, like a plumber or electrician - some suck, some are great. They'll also work out how many panels you need, what angle they should point at and where on the roof they should go, along with what size inverter you require. There's also a lot of cabling, rigging, frames and stuff to support the panels, that they'll charge for. Simply, if the installer is on the recommended list, uses non-shitty panels and SMA inverters, and you pick the best quote out of 3 or 4, it's all good.

That's pretty much what you need to know when you've decided, "yes, I want solar panels" - ah, but you still need to decide if it's worth getting solar panels in the first place. Basically, the aim of solar panels is to negate power you suck off the grid (i.e: cheap power from big stinky, baby dolphin killing, coal fired plants in VIC) in order to save money. Disregard any environmental ideals or nerdy power generation stats, I'm just going to focus on money and how it applies in Victoria (different states have different schemes). If you don't understand a thing I write in this post or don't read it all, just keep this in mind: the way you save money with solar panels is via two methods - buying less power from the power company and selling power you don't use to the power company (called a feed-in-tariff), so your electricity bill is lower or even $0.

The government wants to (or at least, wanted to - the Liberal govt in VIC slashed the FiT by over 50%) give incentives for people to install solar panels. Solar power generation reduces power load on the grid, so building expensive power stations can be delayed, they create jobs for people installing them and you get some greenwashing PR/karma. There's things called RECs and solar credits and all this crap, that make buying the gear cheaper, but you don't need to worry about that. The installer will claim all that for you and take it off the price of installation. So all you need to consider is the FiT. It makes a big difference as to how long it takes you to pay back the cost of installing the panels and getting to the stage where you're generating free electricity.

The FiT is credit the power company puts on your bill for power you generate, but don't use and is fed back to the grid. So for example, it's 1PM and really sunny, but nobody is home, so there's minimal power usage in your house. The solar panels on your roof are making fat stacks of electricity that the house isn't using! Precious electrons going down the drain! Thanks to the fact your house is hooked up to the power grid, that un-used power goes to the power company and they give you credit on your power bill for it. With solar, whenever the sun is shining, power is generated. You probably aren't going to use all that power when it's generated, so you can store it to use it later (a battery), or feed it back in to the grid and get credit on your bill.

The current tariff people like me are concerned about, in VIC, is called the "Transitional Feed-in Tariff" - it's for solar systems up to 5kw in size (get to that later) and the government promises it will be around until 2016. The minimum you can earn is 25c/kWh, but some power companies give you more than that (e.g: Origin give you 31c and some give 1:1 credit based on what you pay for power, so you really need to work out a good balance between what you pay and what you earn). The FiT used to be 60c/kWh up until the 1st of Jan 2012 and in other states, is still around that amount :(

Solar power also reduces the amount you suck from the grid, hence, you aren't paying anyone for it. Again, for example, it's a sunny day, and your system is generating 3kw of power. Your house is busy, there's a TV on, a few computers, fridge, freezer, washing machine, dish washer, etc. and the total power usage of your home at that point in time is around 4.5kw. Normally, without solar power, you'd be paying for the full 4.5kw, but with solar, it's only 1.5kw. Less power use = less money (and carbon emissions, but whatever, pfft, dolphins, fuck em). If you have a bigger solar setup (5kw is the biggest under the Transitional FiT), during the day, you may not even touch the grid and you end up feeding power to it and you end up in the FiT scenario where the power company pays you instead of you paying them.

At night, you generate fuck all, so all your power use comes off the grid. That's where your credits come in to play. So lets say you're at work during the day, the house is generating much more power than it's using, earning you credit. Let's make up that it's made $5 in credit for that period. Then at night, you use $4 of power, but make none. At the end of the billing period, for that day, you end up getting credit of $1. Extrapolate that out to a billing quarter and you can break even if on average, you generate the same amount of excess power as power you use from the grid, you can get a bill which is noting but credit if you don't use the grid at all and generate more solar than you use, or (the most likely scenario) if you end up using just a low amount from the grid and use all the solar power you generate, your bill will go from $300/q to only $50 or $100/q.

That's pretty much how solar power saves you money.

So sure, solar power will definitely reduce your power bill, but is it worth spending thousands of dollars up front, in order to save a few hundred a year? That's the real meat of this post, everything before was just laying the groundwork. You need to work out how long it will take to pay back the cost of the system and to work out much the system will cost, depends on how much power you use, how much you pay for it and how much power you feed to the grid and what you get for that. And even then, in Victoria, the FiT is a net tariff, (explanation from Energy Matters) "A net feed in tariff, also known as export metering, pays the PV system owner only for surplus energy they produce; whereas a gross feed in tariff pays for each kilowatt hour produced by a grid connected system." This makes it hard to predict how much money you'll earn from the FiT as solar production and home energy use isn't static. It's done in 30 min chunks via your smart meter. So in 1 hour, if you generated more than you used, you get 25c per kW. But for the sake of trying to estimate if something is even remotely worth it, we can calculate a quarter's solar generation and a quarter's power consumption and assume the difference generated earns a FiT. But keep in mind that you're metered every 30 minutes, not per day for power in/out of your home.

PVOutput is sweet website where people get their inverters set up to send daily data about how much power their solar systems generate. In Bacchus Marsh, there's 7 solar systems of various sizes. This dude's 5kw system generated 1857kWh from Sep 01 to Nov 30. For the same period, I used 920kWh in my small house here in St. Albans (gleaned from my latest power bill). So if I increase that by 50% to factor a larger house, I can guestimate I'll use 1380kWh. Taking that estimate, if I installed a 5kw solar system on the roof, I would have fed into the grid around 400kWh, which at the current 2012 minimum FiT would have given me a credit of $100. Add in the service charge (65c/day x 91 days = $59.15), I would have a bill (ex GST) of $40 credit. So for that quarter, I paid no money to the power company. If I didn't go solar, I would have used say, 1400kWh. At current rates, I'd need to pay the power company $325 (ex GST).

Let's generously over-estimate that I end up paying the power company $250/year for power if I get solar. And let's estimate that I pay the power company $1400/year without solar. With solar, I'm saving $1150/year, with a 5kw system. However, a good 5kw system costs around $13,500 all up. At the rate of $1150/year, it would take almost 12 years to break even. That's not acceptable, because the inverter probably won't last that long, meaning I'd have to pay about $700-$1000 to get a new one installed if it fails, as the warranty is only 5 years. 12 years is a long time and there's no promise the FiT will still be around. To me, with that calculation, the panels are not worth it. I'm better off just paying extra and getting 100% green power on my bill and installing a power usage meter with ZigBee/Bluetooth/wi-fi on my switchboard to satisfy my lust for power stats.

However, electricity prices will increase, that's pretty much a given. Prices will increase by 10%-20% mid-2012 due to the carbon tax and just because energy costs more each year. For example: 14.23c/kWh (govt owned, in 2002) vs. 21.30c/kWh (Powercor, in 2012), which is a 49.68% increase over 10 years, 4.9% a year. Solar panels also output less (seems to be about 0.8-1%/yr) power over time, so if you do the math on that (4.9% increase for electricity, a 12% one-off increase for the carbon tax and a 1% yearly degradation on the solar panels), using a solar production average of 18kwh/day (average from the yearly production of this 5kw system in Sunshine on pvoutput) and average usage of 15kwh/day (my current average usage + 50%), I would break even in late 2020 (about 9 years). Still not a very good use of $13,500 I reckon.

So in this scenario, a 5kw system (the largest you can get and still be eligible for the TFiT), an install price of $13,500 (SMA inverter, decent panels & reputable installer), in Bacchus Marsh, VIC, with a household power usage of 15kWh/day and average solar generation for the year at 18kWh/day, you're looking at a 9-10 year payback time. 10 years is a long time to wait and hope for some pay off. Ideally, I'd like to have the system generating free electricity after 5 years. To achieve that, the price of install needs to come down. If I could get a good 5kw system for $10,000, that would help significantly. Reducing power usage to only 12kWh a day would help too. It'd be nice if the FiT was increased by the government as well. If the cost of the panels came down and I used less power, I could probably have the system paid off within 5 years from the savings I make and then enjoy a solid 5-10 years of free electricity.

Will I put the panels on my new home? Still not sure. I'm on the fence as to wether to bother or not. It would be nice to do so, as there are other benefits besides money. It's good to reduce carbon emissions. Who knows what the next 5 years hold in terms of energy production? The price of power could go up by more than 5% each year and as the price of grid electricity goes up, generating your own is more and more attractive. If I lived in Queensland/northern NSW/northern SA, solar panels would be so dumb not to do - way more sun than Victoria and much better government incentives. Alas, Victoria's abundance of otherwise useless brown coal and relative lack of sunlight kinda impedes solar power for us

If I've made any gross miscalculations in my estimates, particularly on how I calculated the bills I'd pay post-solar install, please let me know - my email address is aagius@gmail.com

Posted

LTE Makes Grown Men Cry

This post is me ranting in order to think out loud and brainstorm, it probably makes no sense, but if you got something out of it, congratulations.

I was in Albert Park last week, with a weak LTE signal, downloading files at 30mbit and uploading at 4mbit. That's goddamn amazing. And not only are the speeds good, the latency is low too. Under 100ms pings to common AU servers, Under 30ms to Telstra servers. Like many things lately, it blows my mind this exists and I'm alive to see it. I still have clear memories of running a 20m extension cord along the hall to the phone socket, praying to the technological Gods to grant me the magic of a stable 14kbit/sec connection to my ISP (oh Alphalink and your 100mbit satellite). People *still* commonly use ADSL1 and speeds of 8mbit are looked upon favourably. Well fuck that ancient shit, thanks to the magic of modern radio frequency engineering I can sit *outdoors*, no fuck it, sit in the back seat of a moving car, and suck down data at 40-50mbit without a care in the world. It brings tears to my eyes, how far we've come. But anyways, the reason I'm writing this is to kinda outline a vague solution for superfast Internet anywhere, any time (in a 4G area).

I want to webcast some events in HD using HTTP Live Streaming (thanks to Flash now supporting it) and do this, you need a solid Internet connection with fast upload speeds, about 3mbit, at least. Most places that have events/conferences on would have some sort of Internet, but it sucks in some way or another, except for LTE.

  • ADSL, the most common form of Internet found doesn't have the upstream capacity.
  • Telstra/Optus cable is pretty rare in these sort of venues, but even if it did exist, still not enough upstream bandwidth.
  • Fibre isn't unheard of, but is still pretty rare. Only one venue I know of has it, and it costs a bomb to use it.
  • 3G is the easiest net connection to get going, but even with HSPA+, in real world use, it doesn't have the upstream bandwidth.
  • Vivid Wireless has a metro WiMax network, which I am still yet to try out. Coverage is spotty, but going by some speed tests on Whirlpool, may have enough bandwidth in the right conditions. With a decent antenna, it could be a good fallback option for LTE.
  • BigAir, is the "enterprise" version of Vivid Wireless and actually does have the bandwidth and coverage necessary, but it is not portable. They only sell fixed wireless solutions.

So that leaves us with LTE. Has enough bandwidth and coverage is pretty solid. The key thing is that the signal is strong. There should be enough bandwidth on the tower, on the day, but you need to ensure a strong, solid connection to that tower.

The plan would be, outdoors (preferably on a roof), stick an antenna of some type on a stand (weighted down) connected to the USB modem, which is plugged into a Dovado Tiny running off a battery (perhaps with a solar panel to charge whilst in use), or mains power if a cord can be run to the roof. Then run an ethernet cable back down from the roof inside and plug it into the stream broadcasting PC.

Alternatively, Telstra (or someone) will release a battery powered LTE router, or maybe even Netcomm will let me buy one of these outdoor LTE wi-fi/ethernet routers. It has the LTE modem embedded, so all it needs is a PoE connection and you're set.

My theory is that if there's a strong signal, I should be able to maintain a steady 3-4mbit upload speed in order to send a H264 stream out to the cloud to be transcoded & segmented on a Flash Media Server, then sent to a CDN so it can be watched by people anywhere in the world.

This means that if I want to live stream some conference *cough* One More Thing 2012 *cough*, I don't need to worry about what sort of net connection the venue has. The only issue is that if I promise a live stream and then on the day I find that the tower has shat itself and uploads are only hitting 1mbit or 2mbit, then I'm fucked and would need to post-pone, or make a much lower quality stream available via Vivid Wireless or 3G on Optus/VHA. Either way, beats the shit out of paying $20-30-40,000 to use a satellite truck!

Posted

Life's Too Short for Fucking Around With HTPCs

A few years ago, some friends and I set up a 30TB file server (20x 1.5TB drives), dubbed the Big Arse File Server (BAFS), to be a communal off-site backup of all our illegally downloaded material.

It lived in my office, which was a great spot as most of the time there's nobody in it, it's air conditioned and in a central location for us all to visit regularly to dump data to. The major negative was that the server was super noisy and I didn't want to work with this 4RU server covered in Delta fans blasting all day. There's a reason datacenters exist. I spent $200 on quieter fans, hoping to alleviate the noise. Unfortunately the fans didn't push enough air, and over time, a couple of HDDs failed and I decided to strip the server and get rid of it. The BAFS started off with good intentions, but it was impractical and nothing but an adventure in extravagant nerdery.

Since then, I've given up trying to hoard TV shows and movies as it's a futile and useless task. I even find software (great software by the way) like Plex & XBMC to be a waste of time. My HTPC setup is simple:

  • A Windows 7 PC plugged in via HDMI to a TV.
  • Keyboard and mouse on the coffee table.
  • sabnzbd running in the background.
  • When I want to watch something I visit nzbmatrix, search for it, download.
  • Wait a few minutes, then open the file in Media Player Classic and watch.
  • Delete files once I've watched it.

I do keep a small (about 200GB) collection of rainy-day material, but they're just files dumped in a folder. I could easily set up XBMC, have a 10TB collection of 1080p movies and TV shows, ready to watch whenever I like, but it's an expensive time-sink.

  • I rarely, if ever, re-watch what I download. Watch once, then delete.
  • If I do want to watch something again, I can just re-download it. Unless it's some Australian content, it's pretty easy to find it again.
  • I am blessed with 100mbit internet at home. A 720p TV show downloads in about 5 minutes.
  • I've never found myself in the oft-used situation where people are over at my house and it's like "let's browse the HTPC and find a movie to watch!"
  • There's also no technology illiterates in my house. Natalie is perfectly capable of using Windows-goddamn-Explorer.
  • If something is really-really-really good (e.g: The Wire, anything by Tarantino, motherfucking Star Wars), I buy it on Blu-Ray. Awesome quality (better than a 1080p rip) and special features out the wazoo. Plus, you know, it's not illegal.

Next time you're spending cold hard cash, upgrading your HTPC with more storage for shit you'll never watch again, or spending another weekend sorting out or tweaking some auto-magic-ten-foot-UI-software package, ask yourself if it's really worth it.

In an ideal world, Apple would open up the AppleTV and each of the US TV networks would have an app (HBO, Comedy Central AMC, FX, Showtime, NBC etc.), as well as the Australian networks (which we already have on the Xbox - awesome) and pay a few bucks a month for their apps to watch the shows legitimately right after release, as well as a back catalog of older stuff. The movie studios would get their shit together and release more stuff to the iTunes store, faster, in 1080p, with special features and let me pay a flat monthly subscription (say, $50/m for unlimited access). If all these digital stars aligned, and it doesn't seem too far off from happening, I wouldn't need a HTPC at all and wouldn't need to fuck around downloading stuff off Usenet.

Posted

Another Day, Another Failure

You probably noticed that my attempt to crowdfund a follow up Q&A online TV series for One More Thing has bombed. I asked for $25,000 and I was offered $9,500. Seeing as the project wasn't fully funded, no-one's credit cards are charged and I don't get a cent. So even though it failed, it's not as if I ripped anyone off, or I have to make do with a pittance and try pull off what I promised. All I wasted was some time and a little bit of pride.

A logical assumption would be to try do what I wanted to do anyway, without the money, but I'm not sure if this extension of 2011's One More Thing will go any further on my own steam. I never intended to do anything post-One More Thing. Just do the conference and leave it at that. But I thought it would be a cool idea to get the pile of questions from the conference answered, plus it's a great opportunity to try my hand at some video production. A follow-up to 2011's One More Thing may still happen in some way, but I'm not going to promise anything. It's coming to the point where I need to seriously start thinking and planning One More Thing for 2012 - which if it happens (not 100%) it looks like it will have nothing to do with iOS - so time to do a 2011 follow up is slipping away.

Besides, I feel like I've worn out my welcome. Shit or get off the pot. Talk is cheap and ideas are free. Etc, etc. I'm a little embarrassed I put myself out there, talked myself up, then failed to deliver, but I'll get over that. It's probably just me being overly optimistic, ignoring my faults and creating excuses for what happened, but it's not the end of the world. A few years ago I watched James Savage talk about failure and at Webstock this year, I saw Merlin Mann talking about being scared shitless. They both explained to me that it's okay to fuck up.

 

It's okay to fuck up, but it's one thing to not learn from those fuck ups...

 

BEING AN INTERNET CHUGGER SUCKS BALLS
The hardest part of the whole crowdfunding thing asking people for money. Pozible even mention in their FAQ that you need to get over that in order to succeed. For me, that feeling didn't go away throughout the process. By the end of it, when I knew I wasn't going to get enough money, I was relieved I didn't have to do another round of pimping to get it over the line. Particularly within the cynical and snarky tech-space in Australia, it's hard to not be a wanker. I was really uncomfortable with it and for this reason, probably won't try crowdfunding again.

JUST SHUT UP AND DO IT
The other part of crowdfunding is having to do everything in public. You gotta let everyone know what you want to do and not only tell them, convince them it's a good idea. People analyse your plans, second guess you, think they know better and shit on your parade. Sometimes they're right and you're grateful, but 90% of feedback is utter shit. And you can't just dismiss these people or fob them off - due to the public nature of crowdfunding, if you retort to that feedback in a way someone doesn't like, they then spread it around to their mates that you're a dickhead and nobody gives money to dickheads.

There's a lot to be said for just shutting the fuck up and getting something done. Apple does it. Not a word about their future products is spoken about outside the company, then *boom* one day you have a finished product. That's how I like to operate. Crowdfunding isn't conducive to this. You need to share your idea and your execution, making it easy for others to interfere.

If that project fails, it fails in public. If I simply tried to get this off the ground by pitching to a few advertisers and tried to get their money, and didn't - the only people that would know would be me and a couple of advertisers. Whilst I said earlier it's okay to fail, you don't really want people to know you failed, if you can help it.

WHAT THE FUCK IS IT YOU WANT?
Easily, the biggest mistake I made was not properly communicating what I actually wanted to do. People thought it was actually going to be on TV. People didn't understand why it needed $25,000. Some thought it was going to be an indefinite thing (going on for weeks and weeks). I clearly failed to make people grasp what it was that I wanted to do. Huge mistake. I didn't give my pitch enough effort to be concise and clear enough so that a passer by gets the idea, it was far too convoluted.

This also resulted in a lack of coverage in the media, as if a journalist can't be fucked summarising it themselves (95% of the time that's the case) and it's not explained to them in such language that an illiterate person can comprehend, then you get ignored. Even with my connections within the Australian IT media, nobody covered it except for one or two of the smaller sites.

I tried to clarify the pitch towards the end, by doing two pilot episodes of the show, but that didn't go too well. I was fumbling around getting things set up, and the end product didn't accurately reflect what the show was going to be like. I also did the pilot at the end. I should have done the pilot first, then gone to crowdfunding. I think if I did a proper first episode and put a lot of effort into it, that would have been the perfect pitch and the project would have found more supporters.

I'M NOT PAYING FOR THAT
With crowdfunding projects I've supported, there's been a physical thing you know you're going to get. Something you can see and put a price on - "Oh yeah, that widget should cost $50, I'll give them $50". What I wanted to, a video show, nobody fucking pays for these days. Movies, documentaries, albums, etc. yeah, people pay for those, but not podcasts, or TV shows. That stuff is free. I was pushing shit uphill to try get people to pay for something they would normally get for free.

The rewards I was giving were not that enticing either, particularly in the low end. I don't know how I could have better done that, but I'm sure there was some way to improve the rewards which would have seen an increase in supporters.

I THOUGHT YOU WERE MY FRIEND?
It was a bit disappointing to see that a lot of people I thought would have my back, didn't even bother throwing in a a few dollars. Sure, they may have thought the idea was balls, but if it was the reverse, I'd have given at least some pity money. I don't know why they didn't support me. Maybe they don't really like me? Or they thought the idea was so stupidly shit, they couldn't bring themselves to put their hard earned towards it and didn't want to hurt my feelings by telling me it sucked. Honestly don't know the reasons, but I know it really upset me at first. I'm talking about people I talk to almost daily, people I've loaned substantial amounts of money to, people I've gone out of my way for. I guess it becomes clear who really thinks what of you when money is involved.

IT'S NOT KICKSTARTER
I wrote about this already. I don't think it was a major factor, but it certainly hampered US Apple related blogs giving a damn.

Posted

Always Remember That Modern Smartphones Are Fucking Amazing

I'm noticing a significant amount of indignant and upset people complaining about something they have every little knowledge about. It's time to put the iPhone 4S into perspective.

Making a Mobile Phone is Fucking Hard - There seems to be this impression, that every year, without fail, there's a massive leap in mobile technology. That was true initially, but 4 years on and that progression has slowed down. Hardware (and software) improvements and new designs just don't come out of thin air. That shit is difficult. Think about the steps required to improve the things you want improved in your device. Not easy is it? Change in this industry comes incrementally. Even with Apple's massive cash pile and the brightest engineers in the world, there's limits to the possibilities of physics and engineering, as well as the difficulties in bringing that to market on a mass scale at a realistic price.

With that preamble, let's go through the common complaints about the iPhone 4S and explore why most of them are nothing but whinging from people that don't know any better - like a kid who wants to go higher on the swing, but doesn't realise that the higher you go, the higher the chances of breaking your neck. It's not a personality flaw, or even stupidity, it's simply a case of not knowing the logical reasons behind the decisions Apple takes (hint: they aren't out to deliberately mislead, deceive or deprive you - they want to give you what you want in order to increase the chances of you giving them money!)

NO NEW DESIGN, NOT BUYING
Easily the most pathetic complaint regarding the iPhone 4S is that it's the same design - why the shitfuck should Apple change the iPhone design for no good reason? If you analyse Apple's designs (they have many products, so they do some backflips, aka iPod Shuffle), they generally move on when there's a real case for improvement. The Mac Pro has been the same since 2003. Why change it? It works damn well, looks beautiful and the manufacturing process is already in place. Apple is very proud of the iPhone 4 design, Steve Jobs even compared it to a Leica camera. Honestly, go out to the rest of the market and find phone with better build quality. Some designs may be more practical than others and taste in what is aesthetically pleasing varies, but the iPhone 4 is an industrial engineering masterpiece, produced in enormous scales. Nobody makes a single model phone in the quantities Apple does. That's not to say nobody makes a quality phone, but there's very few (or none, I'm yet to see one) that rival the construction quality of the iPhone 4. When you've got a product such as that, selling like absolute hotcakes, which probably cost tens of millions to design, why throw it away for some whiney "but mummmmmm it looks the same, I don't want it" droning? Besides, it means your iPhone 4 accessories still work!

I WANTED A BIGGER SCREEN, IPHONE 4S DOES NOT COMPETE
A larger screen sounds great in theory, and even looks quite nice on other phones - but there are trade offs with that decision to go for a larger display. The most obvious trade off with a larger screen is a larger phone over all. Some of you might not mind this (I don't mind a larger device, I have relatively manly hands), but then the whole balance between, size, weight, proportions and how the device fits in your hand is changed. There's also the fact that the larger screens are mainly AMOLED, which in my opinion, are not as good as the IPS panel Apple employs. There's a head to head comparison here on Engadget. The display on the current Galaxy model is improved over the one in that review, but the criticisms of AMOLED vs. IPS are still true. Then there's the fact nobody (LG, Samsung, Sharp, etc.) is making AMOLED displays at the 640×960 resolution Apple is locked in to. Change the screen res to anything other than 640×960 or 1280x1920 and you have a clusterfuck of epic proportions (aka, Android apps).

IT'S NOT DIFFERENT ENOUGH TO THE IPHONE 4 TO WARRANT MY HARD EARNED MONIES
I totally dig that. It's one of the more legitimate concerns. I too like lording it up with my new shiny iThing when people I dislike are left in a technological stone age with the digital equivalent of a flint stone axe. But actually complaining about the new thing not being that much better than your old thing is rationally a good thin. It's testament to how good Apple's product is, that the one from last year still works just as well as you want it to. Would you rather they release a new device every 6 months that totally makes what you have obsolete? (I would love that, but most people wouldn't). I love bells and whistles as much as the next guy, but what did you expect from Apple to include? Some of the more commonly bleated omissions are are NFC and LTE (the only ones I could find besides a larger screen and older design, which I covered above). NFC, which I do want and reckon would be cool, isn't quite ready for prime time. For whatever reason, Apple didn't see it worth adding. I think if Apple added it, then it would drive adoption and then make it useful, but whatever, they didn't and NFC is minor in the scheme of things. LTE (aka 4G) is the other and well, have you see the power consumption of LTE devices? And all that LTE coverage around the world? Yeah.. So taking all that into consideration, there's not a lot Apple could have feasibly improved upon from the iPhone 4 without hitting the limits of technology and mass market suitability. And that's a good thing (for you, not me, I want a new iPhone every 3 months, no matter how minor or the cost) as the obsolescence curve can be toned down a little - one of the major complaints people have with these technogadgetythings.

ANDROID PHONE HAD IT ALREADY! WHY WOULD I BOTHER?
Android device makers (Samsung, HTC, etc.) flood the market with new devices and their upgrade cycle coincides with whatever new parts are available for them to cobble together a new phone. There's nothing wrong with that and I like that approach. Just don't begrudge Apple for not being first and insulting them for it (and vice versa for when a competitor implements a feature the iPhone had first, like a high PPI display). When HTC release a flagship phone with the same CPU that Samsung put in theirs, does that mean HTC shouldn't bother? The parts in all these mobile phones are pretty much made by Qualcomm, nVidia, Samsung or Texas Instruments, using the same ARM based architecture. It's pretty much the same as desktop computers and the manufacturers waiting for Intel to spit out a new CPU for them to include in a machine. Apple custom design their own SoC package to suit their needs (that's why they purchased PA Semi), but the fact is, semiconductor technology progresses at a certain pace and nobody really has that massive edge. Apple had a head start with the A4, but other manufacturers caught up when the SoC makers figured out how to eek more power out of the silicon and vice versa.

Hopefully that explains why the iPhone 4S is the way it is. Judge the device based on your needs and if your current gear does it for you, consider yourself lucky. If you think there's a better Android device out there, stick it to Apple and purchase that thing. Just don't whine that the iPhone 4S doesn't do things that are technologically unfeasible, impractical or impede on the overall iPhone experience.

Posted

Criticism of Major News Outlets & Apple Event Reports

An Apple event has just concluded and the most frustrating aspect of this usually fascinating occurrence in the IT industry is the Australian media's reporting of it. Why do I care? Well the stuff below is what most Australians use to form an opinion on the iPhone, so what they write is important in terms of the general population's technology education and expectations. Plus as someone who knows a fair bit about the topic at hand, it's frustrating to see bullshit spread far and wide. It's no different to how a doctor might react to some story about the latest medical breakthrough. Irrational infuriation. I should just ignore it, but I can't let this slide without giving an opinion.

I purposely didn't include dedicated IT websites (Gizmodo, IT News, ZD Net, Delimiter, etc.) as they have their own brand of stupid, which is particularly jarring as they should know better. Read on to enjoy the antics of our revered tech news journalists. Whatever you do, *do not* read the comments on these sites if you value your sanity. The level of stupidity there is off the charts.

Fairfax/SMH/The Age

Screen_shot_2011-10-05_at_8
Fairfax didn't even bother to have anyone up early to cover the news, they simply regurgitated the AP's report on the proceedings. They couldn't even be bothered to place Australian pricing into their article. Fairfax even incorrectly state later on in the piece that "Australian launch details have yet to be released" when right at the top of, there's an Australian release date (Oct 14th). Considering that Fairfax is normally on the ball when it comes to actually having dedicated journalists cover IT, this is a bit crappy.

News Corp/News.com.au/Herald Sun

Screen_shot_2011-10-05_at_8
News Corp waste no time generating false controversy, on the News.com.au home page - "BAD APPLE: iPhone launch a fizzer" - which reverts to a less loaded headline of "iPhone launch: Not every iCloud has a silver lining" when you read the article. Claire Connelly (who has a track record of lame IT reporting) was given the job of reporting on the launch. Props to News.com.au for doing a liveblog (they weren't in attendance in SF though, just doing the same thing I did with MacTalk). The tail end of the liveblog is a lot of quoting people who have their panties in a twist Apple didn't make a new shiny case design or some other retarded product idea they thought of whilst taking a piss in the shower. Lame.

Jen Dudley weighs in with "REBOOT: Apple's new iPhone fails expectations" - another loaded headline, giving a summary of the event and flippantly comparing the iPhone to the competition: Samsung Galaxy S II - a clone of the iPhone, but running Android and the HTC EVO 3D, which the must-have 3D camera. Oh, and of course, the obligatory mention of Apple shares dropping after the announcement. Which happens every announcement, then rallies within a week to an all-time high. Waste of space.

Unrelated to the launch, but written just in time to stir the pot and generate page views for News Corp is Rosemarie Lentini's piece about "Apple's iTunes 'gouging' Australians", spun upon an opportunistic NSW State Fair Trading Minister giving his utterly vote grabbing opinion. Absolutely no mention of the fact that iTunes content pricing is dictated by the content owner, not by Apple. Yawn. Gutter trash.

Ninemsn

Ninemsn_homepage_-_hotmail_messenger_news_sport__more

Regurgitating stuff from the AFP - New iPhone: Fans after complete revamp disappointed - nothing blatantly offensive within. Just the headline (which NineMSN would have come up with) pre-emptively sets the tone, without any actual mention in the article from Apple fans. Shit stirring.

The Australian

The_australian__the_australian_homepage__theaustralian

The Australian didn't bother with a journalist either, cobbling something together from AP, NewsCore and WSJ. The headline is sensible - Apple unveils the iPhone 4S at event at Cupertino - which is what happened and is accurate. The article itself is just a recount of what happened and the stats Apple gave out. The best piece about the event I reckon. No judgements, no hyperbole, no attempt to stir the pot simply to get pageviews or comments - just facts.

They also link to some opinion from an analyst in a piece from Chris Griffin, with some common sense, stating that the iPhone 4S won't be a big massive smash, but will still make Apple fuckloads of money and let them continue to lead their market. Chris also has another piece stating that the iPhone 4S doesn't work on 4G networks (duh). I'll give him the benefit of the doubt, as the level of understanding regarding wireless networks is stupendously low considering how heavily we rely on them. Not a bad job from The Australian. The least shit coverage for sure.

ABC

Screen_shot_2011-10-05_at_8

The ABC take the AFP route too. All that's been added is a paragraph at the start, stating that the iPhone 4S isn't the model we expected and the share price dropped. Aww. The really crappy thing is that on the ABC's front page, it has a headline of "iFlop?" giving the notion that the iPhone 4S has already failed, despite not being released yet. But when you visit the article, the headline changes again, to: "Apple unveils faster iPhone, share price falls" The first part is right, the 2nd part, whilst correct, is misleading. Like I said before, every time there's an announcement, the market reacts like this, only to have Apple shares worth more in a few days. A slight drop in share price is hardly worth mentioning. The reaction of some financial dorks should not be taken into consideration when judging the quality or user reaction to a product. If there was say, a 10% or 15% decrease, that's maybe worth something, but 4% is a blip as far as this stuff goes.

Australian Financial Review

Screen_shot_2011-10-05_at_8

Been Woodhead focusses on the financial impact of the launch, as that's the AFR's prerogative. What perplexed me was the decision to dedicate a large chunk of the story to tweets from random, unimportant people on Twitter, voicing their equally unimportant opinions on a device they don't own or have even held. Bizarre. There's also an article about how the retail sector may be shitty because the iPhone 4S apparently won't sell as well as an iPhone 5, but I can't read it due to the paywall.

Posted

AV Gear For Hire

Canon XF100 Video Camera (3 available)

Full specs on Canon website - Includes:

  • 2x 32GB CF cards per camera (suitable for approx 160 min of recording at max quality)
  • Standard battery (BP-925, approx 125min) and extended battery (BP-975, approx 385min), with charger
  • carry case/bag

 

Fancier FC-270 Tripod (3 available)

Full specs on Fancier website
Comes with carry bag

 

Sennheiser MD46 Microphone (2 available)

Full specs on Sennheiser website
includes XLR cable (3m & 10m lengths) & hard case

 

Rode Lavalier Microphone (2 available)

Full specs on Rode website
includes XLR cable (3m & 10m lengths), 3m & 1m MiCon cable, XLR MiCon connector, hard case

 

Zoom H4n Audio Recorder (1 available)

Full specs on Samson website
includes hard case, 2x 4GB SD cards, mains power adaptor, 4x AA batteries

 

CN-1200H LED Lights (4 available)

Specs on manufacturer website
includes boom stands, colour temp filters and carry case

 

Posted

One More Thing Online TV Series - Crowdfunding FAQ

Seeing as you read this blog, no doubt you've noticed me pimping this project around the Internet for a few weeks. Whilst pimping, I've been asked similar questions often and it is tiring to repeat them over and over to each person individually. So, here's a blog post explaining some of the common questions, in detail for everyone to read. Enjoy.

Why didn't you use Kickstarter? What the shit is Pozible?

Not to denigrate Pozible, but you're right, I should have used Kickstarter (I like Kickstarter). Kickstarter has that immediate cachet and makes people think "ooh, Kickstarter, cool shit in here". Pozible, despite being practically the same thing, doesn't enthuse people like Kickstarter does. So why did I use it over Kickstarter? Kickstarter needs you to use Amazon Payments and agree to these terms:

To be eligible to start a Kickstarter project, you need to satisfy the requirements of Amazon Payments. Check each requirement to confirm:

  • I am 18 years of age or older.
  • I am a permanent US resident with a Social Security Number (or EIN).
  • I have a US address, US bank account, and US state-issued ID (driver’s license).
  • I have a major US credit or debit card.

I'm over 18, but the rest, I do not have. The dudes making the Opena (nice guys btw, can't wait for mine to ship) who are Australian, got around the last 3 requirements by having a relative in the US set up the project for them. I unfortunately, do not have anyone in the US I know well enough to handle that significant amount of money for me. Poizlbe is Australian and all they ask for is an AU bank account, which I have.

That is why I didn't use Kickstarter.

$25,000!? Are you out of your fucking mind? How many hookers are included in that estimate?

 

There's two threads within that sort of comment (which has been by far, the most prevalent opinion regarding the project): 1. "It shouldn't be that big and elaborate. Scale down your ambition and you'll be able to get it done without having to beg for money on the Internet like a hobo" and 2. "$25,000 is pretty expensive for what you want to do, it shouldn't cost that much."

In reply to thread 1 - I want to aim large. I want the quality of the production to justify the quality of the content. Throughout my time running MacTalk and doing things like this, the broken window theory has always rung true for me. It's like how you have apps such as Garageband, or iPhoto, which are so beautiful and so enticing, that you want to create stuff in order to use them. Sure, it's no excuse for crappy content, but if your content is presented poorly, it's going to have less chance at success.

I totally understand the just get it out there on a tiny budget line of thinking. The whole thing about not trying to be perfect, but just putting it out there. I've done that. I'm lucky enough now that I can at least try to do a project with the people and resources I want, rather than with what's lying around. Some people are not as lucky as me and need to do it with no resources. I know how that feels, I've done that, and it sucks. Nobody does that by choice, but by necessity. I'm going to give doing it as best as I can a shot, rather than just getting by.

For the second point - that $25,000 is too much money for a production like this, then you may be right. If you crunch numbers and scrimp a bit, you can lower the price, but when you budget for something, you over estimate. I've been left short so many times when I try to accurately budget. It's always better to have more than you expect, than less. Anyone who has had experience in broadcast quality television will explain to you that $25,000 for a 5-episode show is bottom of the barrel. When split across the series, it's only $5,000 per episode. When you consider hiring 5 cameras per shoot ($250 each), almost 15 lights, 6 microphones, paying guests for their travel expenses (Hobart, Brisbane, Sydney x3, Perth x2), hiring somewhere to shoot the thing and building a set - plus extra things like websites, promotional material, music, motion graphics and hosting, $5,000 per episode doesn't leave much fat in the budget.

I know I sold MacTalk and apparently have a large chunk of cash lying around (which I don't, but I'll let you believe I do), why would I spend $25,000 of it on a project that won't make any money? The idea of crowdfunding is that people are supporting a project they want to see happen. Lots of people, chipping in a little bit in order to enjoy the fruits of someone's labour. It's not some scam for you to give me money which I keep and sit on. I gotta spend that money to make the show!

Why are you focussing on iOS development? You don't even code. What gives? What's in it for you?

Damn straight I don't code. I don't even design apps. I also can't play an instrument, but I still love music. I can't kick a football more than 20 meters, but I like footy. I admire the talents and skill required to develop software and the people I've met who do it well and do it for a living are inspirational. Their work is also incredibly fun and useful.

Initially, I simply wanted to meet the people behind the apps I use every day. Then I wanted to know more about them and their journey and share that with others. Now I want to encourage the wider developer community to create awesome software that I might use.

There's also the chance to have a nice closing chapter to One More Thing - this whole thing came out of a conference about iOS development. Next year, I don't think we'll be doing another conference about iOS, so this gives me a chance to wrap up all the loose ends regarding iOS and focus on another area that One More Thing can explore.

A big factor is that I also enjoy the process. Planning and creating a conference was kinda enjoyable. It was stressful at times, but the work itself was great and the outcome was wonderful. Same with this video project - I'm an A/V nerd, so getting to use cameras, lighting, mics and recording interesting content, then editing it and presenting it as best as I can is fun. It's like making a cake or a special dish. The process of cooking is just as fun as eating the meal at the end.

Posted